According to the marvel comics “The Amazing Spider-Man” written and made
by Zeb Wells, Todd Nauck, and Frank D’Armata, they state a great argument about
President Obama and how they think he is a good president. They argue that
President Obama is doing a great job of being president and that Washington is
in good capable hands. They show this through a comic strip and having Spiderman
be good friends with President Obama. I don’t think that the article is believable
because they are just stating their opinion on how they like Obama when not
everyone thinks that. People’s views are all different in this comic they just
state their side of the argument and not anything about the other side. The do
prove their point of the argument by ending with having Spiderman saying that
everything is in good hand because President Obama is president. The strategies
the authors used were making Spiderman part of the comic which is a great idea because
people love Spiderman and it will grab their attention. It worked very well because
it grab my attention and made me want to read it because it looked interesting
with President Obama and Spiderman all in one topic.
The author’s used good strategies by using a
lot of color which made the comic look cooler and more entertaining to look at.
The used a big special design font for the title that makes it look like it’s a
super hero comic book because it looks like the super hero ones. The used good
graphic pictures of everything they talked about in the argument which made it
easy for us to picture it. One of the main really good strategies they had was
putting this type of argument that wouldn’t usually be very exciting into a
comic with Spiderman because it will grab the attention of all ages and anyone
who like Spiderman which most people do. Overall the author did a pretty good
job on presenting his argument by using a marvel comic with Spiderman to state
how the like President Obama.

Good work, Nichole. (And thank you for the visual!) When was this published? Do you think it would have the same effectiveness today?
ReplyDelete